verification word: kip

+3



a. Well obviously they could not stop a team with such depth but i actually think having a team win a series without multi-goal scorers doesn't exactly equate to great depth. It just meant that some of the other players stepped up and could mean the stars needed to get it into another gear going into the finals. Having great depth of players is great but I think having your star players in top form/taking another step is equally as important.
b. The Los Angeles Panthers are having a crazy offensive performance in the playoffs this season that I think it just makes more sense to meet firepower with even more firepower. They should just play to their strengths and rather force the New England Wolfpack with Ivan Lacksamus to keep up with them rather than the other way around.
d. Assuming that the sides have equal amounts of each animal, the panthers in my opinion would definitely be the victors. I think wolves in general have much better teamwork but panthers trumps them too much individually that I'm not sure it would matter too much. Like, the wolves would just lose too much going in for individual kills. Wolves are also very cautious in that they usually won't attack if it means they would lose one of their pack which might cost them by not being aggressive.

+3



i think there is two really good answers to this question, being both the Edmonton Blizzard and the Philadelphia Forge. While the Edmonton Blizzard were the best team in the regular season with 49 wins, I actually give the edge to the Philadelphia Forge as the best time that did not make the finals this season. A lot of that comes down to the fact that I think once playoffs started, the Los Angeles Panthers showed they were the clear favorites out of the west whilst it was up for debate in the east between NEW and PHI. I think for the most part that eastern conference team would go 50/50 every time you run it so for me, Philadelphia would have been the only team I could see make the finals.

wc: 133
+2