Create Account

New Changes to Regression
#16

12-07-2021, 02:59 PMNhamlet Wrote: Is it possible to get the Old/New Proposed graphs in the same size/resolution @"TommySalami"

I made this and tried to resize it but it's not quite 1:1

[Image: ezgif-2-9825862f1524.gif]

I'd need to get really accurate with snipping tool.

[Image: TommySalami.gif]


Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard

EDM All-Time Leader in Goals, Assists and Points
Reply
#17

Ph

S2, S5, S18, S22 Challenge Cup Champion
Hall Of Famers: (S7) Alex Reay | (S28) Daniel Merica


[Image: mckeiltbb.png]
[Image: Merica5.gif]
Thanks to Ragnar, Wasty and myself for the sigs.
Reply
#18

12-07-2021, 02:56 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: Strongly disagree with regression plateauing, but that’s always been a gripe of mine. At least now it’s up to 30%.

Glad we could work on finding a compromise in regards to the top end of the scale.

If my math is right you would become stagnant at ~630 TPE :

Reach 630
Regression by 30% (-190 TPE) = 440
Make up 190 TPE over the season which is the number they used I assumed it's some kind of average
Reach 630 again
Rinse and repeat

We might see infinite backup goalies but I don't see someone bringing in 190 TPE a season doing that either.

[Image: lespoils.gif]
Reply
#19
(This post was last modified: 12-07-2021, 03:06 PM by Zombiewolf.)

HO stealing my TPE still

Boooooooooooooooooooooooo

[Image: blurrybad.jpg] [Image: zomboy3.png]
Thank you Brandon, Fish, GeckoeyGecko, Karey, Kit, takethehorizon, and Ragnar for the sigs!
[Image: Pw202QP.jpeg]


Player Page || Update page
Reply
#20

Classic misdirection! Post the worse version so everyone can be mad at that, then show leniency and everyone is happy. I want to riot!!!!!1111

[Image: krash.gif]


[Image: kLRJavo.png][Image: ZjgHcNL.png]

[Image: s9JOf1N.png][Image: wW0VNnL.png]
Reply
#21

Glad feedback was taken to heart by HO. I think it is a step in the right direction for improving player turnover which hopefully will lead to more roster parity, but these changes won't meaningfully improve actual parity because it doesn't address the FHM knowledge gap issues.

[Image: BirdmanSHL.gif]

Jean-François Bokassa
Armada

Proud Father of Johnny Wagner-Svenson

[Image: unknown.png]
Sven Svenson Career Stats


Sweden Raptors pride
Reply
#22

12-07-2021, 03:11 PMLordBirdman Wrote: Glad feedback was taken to heart by HO. I think it is a step in the right direction for improving player turnover which hopefully will lead to more roster parity, but these changes won't meaningfully improve actual parity because it doesn't address the FHM knowledge gap issues.

I do want to say we aren't ignoring this issue and we are trying to work towards a solution on the FHM side of things.

[Image: TommySalami.gif]


Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard

EDM All-Time Leader in Goals, Assists and Points
Reply
#23

I agree with however 7 ends up responding

[Image: Z8yXihx.png]
Reply
#24

12-07-2021, 03:05 PMlespoils Wrote:
12-07-2021, 02:56 PMWannabeFinn Wrote: Strongly disagree with regression plateauing, but that’s always been a gripe of mine. At least now it’s up to 30%.

Glad we could work on finding a compromise in regards to the top end of the scale.

If my math is right you would become stagnant at ~630 TPE :

Reach 630
Regression by 30% (-190 TPE) = 440
Make up 190 TPE over the season which is the number they used I assumed it's some kind of average
Reach 630 again
Rinse and repeat

We might see infinite backup goalies but I don't see someone bringing in 190 TPE a season doing that either.
Anyone willing to be an infinite 630 TPE BUG is a crazy person and outlier. Let them do it.

[Image: 65151_s.gif]





[Image: Tqabyfh.png] [Image: OOcGSpM.png]
Reply
#25

12-07-2021, 03:16 PMbrickwall35 Wrote:
12-07-2021, 03:05 PMlespoils Wrote: If my math is right you would become stagnant at ~630 TPE :

Reach 630
Regression by 30% (-190 TPE) = 440
Make up 190 TPE over the season which is the number they used I assumed it's some kind of average
Reach 630 again
Rinse and repeat

We might see infinite backup goalies but I don't see someone bringing in 190 TPE a season doing that either.
Anyone willing to be an infinite 630 TPE BUG is a crazy person and outlier. Let them do it.

*cough*

[Image: 57771_s.gif]








[Image: U66t7Jy.png][Image: CXrxOKM.png][Image: RyzkmSj.png][Image: zyyvIFD.png]

[Image: lUeg4KM.png]
Reply
#26

12-07-2021, 03:16 PMbrickwall35 Wrote:
12-07-2021, 03:05 PMlespoils Wrote: If my math is right you would become stagnant at ~630 TPE :

Reach 630
Regression by 30% (-190 TPE) = 440
Make up 190 TPE over the season which is the number they used I assumed it's some kind of average
Reach 630 again
Rinse and repeat

We might see infinite backup goalies but I don't see someone bringing in 190 TPE a season doing that either.
Anyone willing to be an infinite 630 TPE BUG is a crazy person and outlier. Let them do it.

I mean he’d be better than you, so

PatriotesUsaWhalers



[Image: CampinKiller.gif]





Reply
#27

12-07-2021, 03:00 PMTommySalami Wrote:
12-07-2021, 02:52 PMNamelessNate Wrote: So uhhhh, what was the thought process from changing it from 10% to 9%? Is that even a significant number of TPE? At 2k that's like 20 tpe lmao

Really, it was just a slight necessary change. When going from 2200 to 2000 TPE, it's a 22 TPE difference in TPE lost in regression, adding the 1% difference on top of that (making a 42 TPE difference) helps bring class peaks back into line.
Ah, so it's that tiny tiny bit between 55 and 54 in S63? Wild lol.

Thanks for the explanation
Reply
#28

12-07-2021, 03:23 PMNamelessNate Wrote:
12-07-2021, 03:00 PMTommySalami Wrote: Really, it was just a slight necessary change. When going from 2200 to 2000 TPE, it's a 22 TPE difference in TPE lost in regression, adding the 1% difference on top of that (making a 42 TPE difference) helps bring class peaks back into line.
Ah, so it's that tiny tiny bit between 55 and 54 in S63? Wild lol.

Thanks for the explanation

Yeah, the best way to see it is on the graphs. In our first proposed regression S55's line from 63 to 64 is going slightly down, in the new one, it's going slightly up.

[Image: TommySalami.gif]


Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard Raptors Blizzard

EDM All-Time Leader in Goals, Assists and Points
Reply
#29

Absolutely go fuck yourselves HO.


Am I doing this right? <3

[Image: JKortesi81.gif]
SpectersScarecrowsDragonsBlizzardUsaSpectersMilitiaDragonsBlizzardScarecrows


Update Page
Player Page
Reply
#30

[Image: 5x01b4.jpg]

[Image: Evok.gif]


[Image: merha.gif]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)




Navigation

 

Extra Menu

 

About us

The Simulation Hockey League is a free online forums based sim league where you create your own fantasy hockey player. Join today and create your player, become a GM, get drafted, sign contracts, make trades and compete against hundreds of players from around the world.