12-31-2022, 12:02 AMspooked Wrote:

12-30-2022, 11:58 PMboom Wrote: I GM’d before and if this was a thing I would not want to see receipts involving a victim/third party’s private exchanges for a player I was never going to draft anyway - it would be invading that person’s privacy. If you’re interested in a player serving an egregious conduct suspension like this, just do the legwork yourself.

He was commenting about my request for GMs to be informed, I was not speaking about the information itself, only my request to be informed as a GM group. Sorry for not being clear.

The thing to me at least about not proceeding on a case by case basis is that as soon as you extend who knows the specifics of the ban, you also open the door to it spreading like wildfire. Let's not lie to ourselves in saying that if ALL GM's know about it more than is said in this post, and some may not even have a vested interest in the player, then there is a possibility that all it ends up doing is exactly what HO wants to prevent : spreading details about it.

I don't want to pile on, but I agree where if you're legitimitely interested, DM HO members.