Simulation Hockey League
Pens v Bruins Series Discussion - Printable Version

+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+---- Forum: NHL Team Forums (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Atlantic Division (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=394)
+------ Forum: Boston Bruins (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=173)
+------ Thread: Pens v Bruins Series Discussion (/showthread.php?tid=23562)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30


- idot - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by Gibby the Red Nosed Reindeer@Jun 4 2013, 09:10 PM

I WILL LICK UR ANUS WITH MY DICK!

[Image: 337px-Dolan-duck-face.jpg]


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by Gibby the Red Nosed Reindeer@Jun 5 2013, 12:00 AM

I didnt expect a respinse on every goal  Tongue
There was 0 1 on 1 like Goddard vs Datsyuk would be. It was Lucic and Horton wiiiide open in front. If they out muscled or were faster then sure, but it was positioning, which apparently is the system so that falls on the players.
In what ways are Malkin and Crosby made to be 4th line grinders?

Why is it that when the Penguins win, its because of the system and because of the players, but when they lose it all falls on Bylsma? It's actually getting ridiculous the way you're allowing it to become this much of an excuse for the guys on the ice with a direct impact on the outcome. This team can do no wrong in your eyes, they have no flaws. Any flaws they do have is because of Bylsma being an absolute retard.

There was no Goddard/Datsyuk, that was an example of something you CAN'T let happen. Niskanen isn't a great defensive player(that's really not how he should be utilized, at least), and he's not very strong, he shouldn't be on the ice when Lucic/Horton are out, and there is no excuse for that match-up when you have home ice. None.

They have to play a grinders game, Crosby can pull it off because he's a freak of nature, but Malkin isn't built to play that way, he's better suited to play like Kovalev used to, TBH.

They do have flaws, they have a lot of flaws. Neal is lazy, Malkin takes stupid penalties, that's not the point, and you are completely missing my point if you think that's what I'm saying, the players have quite a bit of accountability here, but the players job is to listen to the coach, the coach is telling them to do things that are not working and is not giving them optimal conditions to do it(Line matching, line CHANGES, for example). Further, Bylsma just stands there looking like he just shit his pants. How many times when players are being stupid do you go home, and tell them they can have a day off of practice tomorrow? If the Bruins were playing that stupid, do you think Julian, or ANY coach is going to pat them on the shoulder and say "good try"(He does this a LOT)? No, he's going to command excellence from them, he's going to call a timeout, ream them, and tell them to get their heads out of their asses or they can ride the bench(Again, never done this, and I'm not saying do it like Therrien did either), we want a coach, not a BFF for the players.

It's like a Goalie, it's not his fault when a team loses, right? That's only true when the team and the goalie give it their all, if the Goalie let's in soft goals and the team in front of him is perfect, then it IS his fault. Bylsma has the pieces of a team that shouldn't be rivaled, but he's putting a puzzle together, and he's just forcing the pieces together and calling it "done".


- Sg Schultz - 06-05-2013

I already made my "How's that cup run going Iginla" Sign for tonights game , hope they show it on tv Tongue!


- Buster - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by Sg Schultz@Jun 5 2013, 11:01 AM
I already made my "How's that cup run going Iginla" Sign for tonights game , hope they show it on tv Tongue!

U r rude


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

Vokoun is starting.

Iginla, Malkin, and Martin were given the day off([Image: qiwZu9w3fdtyB7mGbMuM.gif]), so we can't get an accurate read on lines.


- Hallsy - 06-05-2013

5-2 Pittsburgh.


- BasedMinkus - 06-05-2013

Bylsma isn't the issue. You make it sound like he hasn't had do anything and let his players play. He won the jack adams without his best three players barely playing at the same time.

The problems have been players not playing a 200 foot game and stupid defensive gaps.


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by JayTee@Jun 5 2013, 12:21 PM
Bylsma isn't the issue. You make it sound like he hasn't had do anything and let his players play. He won the jack adams without his best three players barely playing at the same time.

The problems have been players not playing a 200 foot game and stupid defensive gaps.

The issue is he doesn't just let his players play, he tells them to play his way, and that's that. If it doesn't work, oh well, try it again. And again. And again.

The defensive gaps are entirely on the system as well, the F3 in Bylsmas system always comes low and the other defenseman is to support from nearly behind the net, it's asinine.

You are the only Pens fan I've met so far that is actually happy with how Bylsma handles this team, everyone would much rather Granato or Reirdon were in charge.


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

Here's a fun one, Pens are 35% on the PP when Iginla is on the top unit, but, he doesn't play there a lot(because Neal was good last year there, and again, Bylsma is scared shitless of change[and playing younger players]), but let's go ahead and actually LOOK at the top PP, shall we?


Kunitz-Crosby-Neal
Letang-Malkin

JESUS CHRIST LOOK AT ALL THAT TALENT! THAT'S EASY GOALS!

Let's break it down a little more, and find out why it actually is easy to stop against competent defense.

LHS-LHS-LHS
RHS-LHS

. . .I wonder which side is more dangerous?

The best analogy for Bylsma is this.

<object width="460" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/BIakZtDmMgo"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/BIakZtDmMgo" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460" height="315"></embed></object>

"It'll work. You'll see. It'll work. We just have to keep doing it.", it doesn't if he can see the proverbial lake with his own eyes, he's going to keep trucking along.

This is why Tanner Glass has been in the line-up more then Bennett, why Adams is in despite Vitale being one of those players that NEVER takes a shift off. Dan Bylsma is arrogant, and he has to be right.


- Gibby the Red Nosed Reindeer - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by RehnX@Jun 5 2013, 11:03 AM


There was no Goddard/Datsyuk, that was an example of something you CAN'T let happen.&nbsp; Niskanen isn't a great defensive player(that's really not how he should be utilized, at least), and he's not very strong, he shouldn't be on the ice when Lucic/Horton are out, and there is no excuse for that match-up when you have home ice.&nbsp; None.

They have to play a grinders game, Crosby can pull it off because he's a freak of nature, but Malkin isn't built to play that way, he's better suited to play like Kovalev used to, TBH.&nbsp;

They do have flaws, they have a lot of flaws.&nbsp; Neal is lazy, Malkin takes stupid penalties, that's not the point, and you are completely missing my point if you think that's what I'm saying, the players have quite a bit of accountability here, but the players job is to listen to the coach, the coach is telling them to do things that are not working and is not giving them optimal conditions to do it(Line matching, line CHANGES, for example).&nbsp; Further, Bylsma just stands there looking like he just shit his pants.&nbsp; How many times when players are being stupid do you go home, and tell them they can have a day off of practice tomorrow?&nbsp; If the Bruins were playing that stupid, do you think Julian, or ANY coach is going to pat them on the shoulder and say "good try"(He does this a LOT)?&nbsp; No, he's going to command excellence from them, he's going to call a timeout, ream them, and tell them to get their heads out of their asses or they can ride the bench(Again, never done this, and I'm not saying do it like Therrien did either), we want a coach, not a BFF for the players.&nbsp;

It's like a Goalie, it's not his fault when a team loses, right?&nbsp; That's only true when the team and the goalie give it their all, if the Goalie let's in soft goals and the team in front of him is perfect, then it IS his fault. Bylsma has the pieces of a team that shouldn't be rivaled, but he's putting a puzzle together, and he's just forcing the pieces together and calling it "done".
I understand Niskanen isn't great defensively and he shouldn't be matched up against Lucic and Horton. However that goal had nothing to do with the matchup. If Niskanen did what Bylsma said (in his zone defense) that goal wouldn't happen, or atleast wouldn't happen as easily.

Crosby and Malkin both have great hands and are incredibly strong and hard to knock off the puck. Why shouldn't they be able to play a grinding style? They sound like two guys who could be just as effective playing that style, especially Crosby who is one of, if not the hardest guys to knock off the puck in the league and his leg strength and lower body are ridiculous. Playoff hockey is more physical and more grindy, you gotta be able to play that game and Malkin and Crosby have both proven they have in the past.

The issues I see are defensive lapses though. That and a lack of offense. I believe Iggy said in an interview though that the offense will come but mistakes in the other parts of the game are the problem. Pittsburgh has to much depth and firepower to be held down for a whole series.


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by Gibby the Red Nosed Reindeer@Jun 5 2013, 01:03 PM

I understand Niskanen isn't great defensively and he shouldn't be matched up against Lucic and Horton. However that goal had nothing to do with the matchup. If Niskanen did what Bylsma said (in his zone defense) that goal wouldn't happen, or atleast wouldn't happen as easily.

Crosby and Malkin both have great hands and are incredibly strong and hard to knock off the puck. Why shouldn't they be able to play a grinding style? They sound like two guys who could be just as effective playing that style, especially Crosby who is one of, if not the hardest guys to knock off the puck in the league and his leg strength and lower body are ridiculous. Playoff hockey is more physical and more grindy, you gotta be able to play that game and Malkin and Crosby have both proven they have in the past.

The issues I see are defensive lapses though. That and a lack of offense. I believe Iggy said in an interview though that the offense will come but mistakes in the other parts of the game are the problem. Pittsburgh has to much depth and firepower to be held down for a whole series.

Crosby can do it, he's probably be able to play defenseman if you asked him to. He's that level of athlete. But that's not the point, the point is it affects his linemates, and he could be utilized better.

Those stupid penalties Malkin takes are because he has to play a grinding style of hockey, he doesn't like it, again, he's Kovalev with a better work-ethic.

Niskanen is playing that exactly how Bylsma wants, that was transition defense, not zone. And Bylsma's idea of transition defense is all about support.


- Hallsy - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by RehnX@Jun 5 2013, 10:03 AM
Vokoun is starting.

Iginla, Malkin, and Martin were given the day off([Image: qiwZu9w3fdtyB7mGbMuM.gif]), so we can't get an accurate read on lines.

Maybe they have some bumps and bruises.


- Gibby the Red Nosed Reindeer - 06-05-2013

Quote:Originally posted by RehnX@Jun 5 2013, 02:13 PM


Crosby can do it, he's probably be able to play defenseman if you asked him to.&nbsp; He's that level of athlete.&nbsp; But that's not the point, the point is it affects his linemates, and he could be utilized better.

Those stupid penalties Malkin takes are because he has to play a grinding style of hockey, he doesn't like it, again, he's Kovalev with a better work-ethic.

Niskanen is playing that exactly how Bylsma wants, that was transition defense, not zone.&nbsp; And Bylsma's idea of transition defense is all about support.
Bylsma is not responsible for Malkin's dumb penalties, sorry. If one player apparently does not like the system, you shoudn't change to pertain to his needs. He's not above the team.

As for the transition/zone defense. Which one is this? Seems to me like it calls for zone and the players fucked up.
<object width="460" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ifFVB-Dzcx8"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ifFVB-Dzcx8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460" height="315"></embed></object>

Don't see any support here either
<object width="460" height="315"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/pLQ0T2As2W4"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/pLQ0T2As2W4" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="460" height="315"></embed></object>


- RehnX - 06-05-2013

The first one is basically in transition, everyone thought Cooke had cleared it over the line and they were already down 4-1, so Martin jumps up on the play.

The second one is a horrible shot, Fleury is a headcase in the playoffs. Don't see a defensive lapse there at all, see a shot in transition.

For one player, no. For most of the top 6, yes. Kunitz/Iginla is too slow, Neal is afraid of hitting, Malkin get's frustrated when playing it. Dupuis is good at it, and Crosby is Crosby.

For the defenseman, only Paul Martin is able to make the stretch pass consistently, and there is not enough size to break down attacking forwards, the Pens HAVE the size, but Bylsma won't use it(Bortuzzo and Despres).


- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 06-05-2013

FUCK THE PEN