+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: League Media (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=610)
+--- Forum: SHL Media (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=46)
+---- Forum: Graded Articles (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=545)
+---- Thread: Top 100 SHL Players of Today! (/showthread.php?tid=54691)
- deknegt - 08-10-2015
I didn't vote, I don't complain, I am just rolling in and out of threads giving opinions nobody cares about. Everybody wins?
- .bojo - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by deknegt@Aug 10 2015, 09:41 AM
I didn't vote, I don't complain, I am just rolling in and out of threads giving opinions nobody cares about. Everybody wins?
you won.
... my heart
- ArGarBarGar - 08-10-2015
Here is the general voting criteria that I originally proposed in the discussion thread, and revised once the voters were chosen.
10: Generational (Consistent Superstar)
9: Superstar (Consistent Star/Elite)
8: Elite (Upper-Tier 1st Liner/Starter)
7: Star (Middle-Tier 1st Liner/Starter)
6: Very Good (Lower-Tier 1st Liner/Starter)
5: Good (Upper-Tier 2nd Liner/Backup)
4: Decent (Lower-Tier 2nd Liner/Backup)
3: Okay (3rd Liner With Potential)
2: Bad (Regular 3rd Liner)
1: Awful (4th Liner/Fringe Player)
If there is a demand for it I can post each candidates average as well as individual votes to see how often a player was voted an 8 or 4 or 6 or whatever. I won't reveal which voter voted which unless I get permission from the voter themselves.
- Possum Queen - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by ArGarBarGar@Aug 10 2015, 10:33 AMI'm game for releasing mine. I never get hate mail, and I'm starting to get jealous of Schultzy. :(
If the voters are willing, I can always post the full voting results when the top-100 is revealed.
Keep things transparent and give people something to talk/complain about. :ph34r:
- easymoneysniper - 08-10-2015
Leo made the list before me :(
- .bojo - 08-10-2015
how about next time let voters have 10 votes for each grade. 10 people can get a grade of 10, 10 more get 9, 10 more get 8, etc.
It would force somebody to say ok these two are great, but which one is better
just a thought ignore me otherwise.
- fgh - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by easymoneysniper@Aug 10 2015, 08:46 AM
Leo made the list before me :(
Garb and I both did too :( sorry bud
- Possum Queen - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Bojo@Aug 10 2015, 10:47 AMI was given a limit on each tier. ArGar said it wasn't 100% binding, but I adhered to it and it really made me think more about who got what rating.
how about next time let voters have 10 votes for each grade. 10 people can get a grade of 10, 10 more get 9, 10 more get 8, etc.
It would force somebody to say ok these two are great, but which one is better
just a thought ignore me otherwise.
- ArGarBarGar - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Bojo@Aug 10 2015, 09:47 AMThere were 121 potential candidates, so 10 for each wouldn't work. I did, however, institute a limit as to how many times a voter could give out a certain number:
how about next time let voters have 10 votes for each grade. 10 people can get a grade of 10, 10 more get 9, 10 more get 8, etc.
It would force somebody to say ok these two are great, but which one is better
just a thought ignore me otherwise.
10-6
9-12
8-18
7-24
6-24
5-30
4-30
3-∞
2-∞
1-∞
A little generous, but it was still difficult for voters, regardless.
- deknegt - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by Bojo@Aug 10 2015, 03:42 PM
you won.
... my heart
Shut up baby, I know it.
My heart has an open-door policy, as long as you take off your slacks at the door.
- mstuk41 - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by ArGarBarGar@Aug 10 2015, 09:33 AM
If the voters are willing, I can always post the full voting results when the top-100 is revealed.
Keep things transparent and give people something to talk/complain about. :ph34r:
now that would be interesting...
Good work by you guys for putting this out.
- .bojo - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by ArGarBarGar@Aug 10 2015, 09:51 AM
There were 121 potential candidates, so 10 for each wouldn't work. I did, however, institute a limit as to how many times a voter could give out a certain number:
10-6
9-12
8-18
7-24
6-24
5-30
4-30
3-∞
2-∞
1-∞
A little generous, but it was still difficult for voters, regardless.
Well my idea is more like saying "here's the top 10, then here's the next ten, then the next, etc" That way you guys are giving grades based on how they compared to the rest of the league instead of just how good they are individually.
Then after tallying up the numbers could possibly go deeper and vote on the order within each 10.
- easymoneysniper - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by mpc@Aug 10 2015, 09:50 AM
Garb and I both did too :( sorry bud
These are some sad times :((
- fgh - 08-10-2015
Quote:Originally posted by easymoneysniper@Aug 10 2015, 08:57 AM
These are some sad times :((
Should just be a S21 list tbh
- .bojo - 08-10-2015
Btw I'm not complaining I just wanted to give my 2 cents in case it was good.