+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: General Discussion (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=51)
+---- Forum: NHL Team Forums (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=55)
+----- Forum: Atlantic Division (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=394)
+------ Forum: Montreal Canadiens (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=186)
+------ Thread: What I would have liked from the trade (/showthread.php?tid=2156)
Pages:
1
2
- Mac - 01-14-2012
Bourque and Babchuk for Cammalleri and Kaberle/Beaulieu
Thoughts?
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 01-14-2012
awful for the habs imo
the deal they got is much better
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
wat i wouldve wanted was bourque and a 1st for cami, ramo and a 3rd
- Mac - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by giova65@Jan 14 2012, 12:50 AM
wat i wouldve wanted was bourque and a 1st for cami, ramo and a 3rd
This would also have been much better.
Just think that we lost it from the start, unless Bourque pulls a Lupul and shocks us all with ridiculous chemistry with Plekanec or Gionta.
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Joker582@Jan 14 2012, 01:03 AMbourque will fit in i feel it
This would also have been much better.
Just think that we lost it from the start, unless Bourque pulls a Lupul and shocks us all with ridiculous chemistry with Plekanec or Gionta.
- Mac - 01-14-2012
I hope so, I do like the fact he is a bigger body and will likely slot in on the top line.
What do you think?
Bourque - Plekanec - Gionta/Kostitsyn?
- Dooley - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by giova65@Jan 13 2012, 11:50 PM
wat i wouldve wanted was bourque and a 1st for cami, ramo and a 3rd
Im sure you would want that :lol: :lol:
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Joker582@Jan 14 2012, 01:07 AMkosti
I hope so, I do like the fact he is a bigger body and will likely slot in on the top line.
What do you think?
Bourque - Plekanec - Gionta/Kostitsyn?
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Dooley@Jan 14 2012, 01:08 AMwhy
Im sure you would want that :lol: :lol:
- Dooley - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by giova65@Jan 14 2012, 12:11 AM
why
Because throwing a 1st in there is an overpayment. Cammo isnt worth much more than Bourque when you factor in the contracts.
- Mac - 01-14-2012
Oh, we are factoring in contracts? Should have thrown Gomez into teh trade as a goodwill donation. I hear Calgary needs more trash collectors.
- GroupMeIsKindOfOkay - 01-14-2012
the trade was pretty even...cammo is the better player when he is on, but he is also paid much more
so throw in a 2nd and some other minor pieces and its an even deal value-wise
- Mac - 01-14-2012
The guy showed his worth in the playoffs, Bourque while a decent player has never really shown me he is in Cammalleris league. I hope he proves me wrong.
2014 cannot come fast enough.
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Joker582@Jan 14 2012, 01:24 AMthey have almost the same amount fo goals scored since 2008-09
The guy showed his worth in the playoffs, Bourque while a decent player has never really shown me he is in Cammalleris league. I hope he proves me wrong.
2014 cannot come fast enough.
- Giova69 - 01-14-2012
Quote:Originally posted by Dooley@Jan 14 2012, 01:17 AMi meant to say 2nd from habs nut it would make sense
Because throwing a 1st in there is an overpayment. Cammo isnt worth much more than Bourque when you factor in the contracts.