+- Simulation Hockey League (https://simulationhockey.com)
+-- Forum: Community (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=17)
+--- Forum: SHL Discussion (https://simulationhockey.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=49)
+--- Thread: Bojo Ideas (/showthread.php?tid=70171)
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
All of these ideas are rough drafts! If you see room for improvement let me know.
Also I'm sure to have missed other issues/ideas so let me know. I want to improve the site without changing the core parts that keep us coming back.
Restructured Head Office
- SHL Head office will be me, GM's, and DC.
- I will propose decisions
- Can be veto'd if at least half of the members vote against (within three days)
Redesigned Discipline Committee
- Elections for four DC members. Separate teams, two from each conference.
- Within three days a decision must be made.
- If none, I will decide.
- If tie, I will be tie breaker.
Rulebook refinements
- Headquarters will go through the rule book together to ensure it's up to date and proper
Web Site Improvements
- Admin control = I can play around with ideas!
- Give me tips on how to improve site presentation
- Will create a "prototype" skin that you can use. If it's good I'll move it to production
Inter-conference Rivalry Matches
- East vs West Rewards
- Reward top teams from both
- Makes boring matches more interesting; even for other teams
Recruitment
- 1 tpe flat for each person who joins
- +3 tpe once they hit 300 TPE
- Need advertisement help. I will provide funds. Reddit? Facebook?
Player Tasks
- First off, there's only so many ways you can make writing 200 words or photoshopping a pic interesting every week. It's a challenge. Sunday Fundays were actually a decent idea, I wouldn't mind if we simply expanded that to the weekend.
- I want to eliminate the idea of grading. It should simply be a submission that meets simple requirements that even a nucklehead could do. No longer (1,2,3,4,5), but simply (Yes, No).
- I want to restructure the idea of a cap to either simply eliminating it, or relaxing it. I understand inflation can be an issue, so I won't just go throwing tpe everywhere. But I believe it can be simplified with the same end result. Still workshopping that. Again, open to ideas.
Awards/All-Stars
- Will start at the begining of the playoffs, and will be decided on by the end (with the exception of playoff-related awards obviously)
Discord
- Encourage people to post on the forums as well. Chatting is 100% ok, of course. But if you got something to share, do it on the forums so more people can see.
Cliques
- I know it's scary, but invite people into your groups instead of pushing people away becaues they're new/different/seem odd. More of a rant I've seen in general, including my own team.
Random Ideas
- Clean list of jobs people have on the site
- Clean up the arcade
- Work with groups (like updaters) to see how we can improve a job
Player Builds - mpc
- More options? Less options? I want to see less people with checking as a weakness, maybe even removing that as an option altogether.
- I don't think we should complicate builds by having update scales for each type of player
Forward/Defense Switching - mpc
- Idea I had is to declare what side of the ice you will be playing that season from the start of the season. I'm ok with switching between front and back (heh) but it's a tiny sacrifice to make for cleaning up defense/forward stats and eliminates the issue completely for fantasy.
Army Game - eggy
- No.
- No.
- No.
#BojoPlease
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
Link to questions being answered!
http://theshl.jcink.net/index.php?showtopic=73492
- fgh - 11-28-2016
Can we take another look at Player Builds? Seems they don't mean anything anymore.
Will you actually put your foot down and stop switching of players between forward and defense? Make it something like one per season, it's a purchase to do it
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by mpc@Nov 28 2016, 01:33 PM
Can we take another look at Player Builds? Seems they don't mean anything anymore.
Will you actually put your foot down and stop switching of players between forward and defense? Make it something like one per season, it's a purchase to do it
oh, valid points. I'll update with rough ideas shortly.
- Eggy216 - 11-28-2016
ctrl + f "army"
"0 results"
fuck you bojo
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Eggy216@Nov 28 2016, 01:38 PM
ctrl + f "army"
"0 results"
fuck you bojo
updated
- lil - 11-28-2016
If you're including DC into HO, can you give them more power? As someone who's been on DC, it feels like all we can do is recommend punishments and then HO does whatever they want, and we couldn't see their separate discussions on the issue. Letting DC into the HO forum helps with the second half of that but not the first. I'm not saying there shouldn't be HO oversight for major things but there's no point in a committee if they can't do anything.
Also, can we fix the report system please, way too many people can see reports which has in the past lead to reports being leaked, deleted, etc.
- Merica - 11-28-2016
Still think commish should have to step down from GM. Even if you are a classy person above reproach it's about principal and setting the standard, because you are basically saying you are infallible. Sure, Leafs can check you, but we alll know Leafs is slowly fading into the background. He stepped down as GM and now commish, he's not active like he was before.
- crutch - 11-28-2016
can't wait to run for DC
- WannabeFinn - 11-28-2016
Bojo why r u so good
- BigTittySmitty - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Merica@Nov 28 2016, 01:41 PM
Still think commish should have to step down from GM. Even if you are a classy person above reproach it's about principal and setting the standard, because you are basically saying you are infallible. Sure, Leafs can check you, but we alll know Leafs is slowly fading into the background. He stepped down as GM and now commish, he's not active like he was before.
Well said!!!!!!!!
Also on the F/D thing.. what about those folks who have F/D as primary/secondary positions. I say let stay the same as this way teams can keep their core as a lot of folks just want to stay with their LR and forcing teams to make seasonal moves for a Forward/Defencemen can get annoying.
- storm - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Eggy216@Nov 28 2016, 01:38 PM
ctrl + f "army"
"0 results"
fuck you bojo
*cough* http://theshl.b1.jcink.com/index.php?showtopic=73509 *cough*
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by lil+Nov 28 2016, 01:41 PM--><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1' id='QUOTE-WRAP'><tr><td>QUOTE (lil @ Nov 28 2016, 01:41 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'><!--QuoteEBegin-->If you're including DC into HO, can you give them more power? As someone who's been on DC, it feels like all we can do is recommend punishments and then HO does whatever they want, and we couldn't see their separate discussions on the issue. Letting DC into the HO forum helps with the second half of that but not the first. I'm not saying there shouldn't be HO oversight for major things but there's no point in a committee if they can't do anything.
Also, can we fix the report system please, way too many people can see reports which has in the past lead to reports being leaked, deleted, etc.[/b]
DC will have similar power to a league advisor. They'll be a part of the voting process equal as GM's, and only they will decide on discipline issues.
Reports are more of a technical issue. For now all i can say is if you don't mind being public use the report. Otherwise PM me, your GM, or your commish.
<!--QuoteBegin-Merica@Nov 28 2016, 01:41 PM
Still think commish should have to step down from GM. Even if you are a classy person above reproach it's about principal and setting the standard, because you are basically saying you are infallible. Sure, Leafs can check you, but we alll know Leafs is slowly fading into the background. He stepped down as GM and now commish, he's not active like he was before.[/quote]
I will make mistakes, just as everybody else has. I am not perfect. But Leafs offered this job to me, and I will do the best I can to make sure it's great. I'm opening a system that allows opposition to my actions full of GM's who I know will be active and elected DC's who will be replaced if inactive. I want people to call me out if they think I'm bullshitting them. I will give the Headquarters every chance they can to "impeach" me.
- Tomen - 11-28-2016
Probably beating a dead horse with this:
- I want to restructure the idea of a cap to either simply eliminating it, or relaxing it. I understand inflation can be an issue, so I won't just go throwing tpe everywhere. But I believe it can be simplified with the same end result. Still workshopping that. Again, open to ideas.
I personally think that you shouldn't remove the whole Cap unless you want to drastically limit the TPE that is rewarded currently. I still think that if we would go forward with a PT Cap that you should get rewarded for earning more capped TPE than the current SHL Cap of 35.
Let's say for each 5 TPE that you earn above the Cap you get rewarded 1M. Obviously you can play around with the numbers but I think that would gave people more of a reason to do tasks which will get them capped TPE if it can translate into money. It also would give people more of a reson to track the PT Cap. As an Updater I was shocked to see that there are a rather big amount of people that don't track the PT Cap. (I know that these people mostly aren't active enough to reach the Cap but still).
This Idea would also create more jobs I think or we would just need a thread at season end where everyone can post how much capped TPE they earned over the season to be eligbile for the money payout.
- .bojo - 11-28-2016
Quote:Originally posted by Tomen@Nov 28 2016, 01:52 PM
Probably beating a dead horse with this:
- I want to restructure the idea of a cap to either simply eliminating it, or relaxing it. I understand inflation can be an issue, so I won't just go throwing tpe everywhere. But I believe it can be simplified with the same end result. Still workshopping that. Again, open to ideas.
I personally think that you shouldn't remove the whole Cap unless you want to drastically limit the TPE that is rewarded currently. I still think that if we would go forward with a PT Cap that you should get rewarded for earning more capped TPE than the current SHL Cap of 35.
Let's say for each 5 TPE that you earn above the Cap you get rewarded 1M. Obviously you can play around with the numbers but I think that would gave people more of a reason to do tasks which will get them capped TPE if it can translate into money. It also would give people more of a reson to track the PT Cap. As an Updater I was shocked to see that there are a rather big amount of people that don't track the PT Cap. (I know that these people mostly aren't active enough to reach the Cap but still).
This Idea would also create more jobs I think or we would just need a thread at season end where everyone can post how much capped TPE they earned over the season to be eligbile for the money payout.
Yeah I worded the PT thing weirdly. I basically mean I just want to simplify it, while keeping the same amount of points available.