Quote:Originally posted by RomanesEuntDomus@Jan 4 2017, 01:26 PM
The one thing I don't get about this discussion is that people claim that they want to keep contract talks interesting and don't want to limit GMs options by adjusting salarie, but at the same time they are fine with severely limiting options and making contract negotiations as a whole a lot less interesting by implementing super strict maximum lengths.

Well, it seems like one or the other needs to be limited, and I'd find it more interesting to negotiate salary than contract length.

Edit: Also, lower contract length is an alternative to adjusting salaries every season, by making it happen on a regular but less-frequent basis. It's a compromise, allowing for some negotiation without things going over the top as they have been recently.