Quote:Originally posted by Baelor Swift@Jan 9 2017, 03:59 PM

So which teams should be contracted then? We don't have enough actives for more than a few teams to be running more than six active forwards and four active D. I don't think any GM has a goal of not having enough depth when it's pretty clear that depth tends to be very important in team success here. What this will do is increase parity, hopefully create a situation in which we have a more even distribution of players across teams, and hopefully generate more activity and better member retention. Keeping things the same isn't going to solve the issue you mentioned.

Which professional sports league has parity? Also the SHL has some parity, 6 teams in the east were in the hunt for the post-season until the very end and in the west didnt the last place playoff team get in because of ROW?