Thanks @boom for your question.

The discussion stemmed primarily from the desire to ensure that new players were not influenced at or before their creation. Applying this principle therefore meant better framing the nature of the discussions between all the actors involved. To answer your question more specifically, the approach was taken out of a desire to ensure that this principle was respected, rather than as a response to a current recurring major problem. It was implemented proactively.


EDIT: @ACapitalChicago , message sent at the same. Hope it does answer your concerns as well.